Monday, April 8, 2013

I'm Back - Styles of Teaching

I'm back.  I have been busy with teaching and I haven't kept this blog up to date.  I am the kind of teacher who works until about 5:00, comes home and spends a few hours with my kids, and then once they are in bed, I continue working.

I am currently in the middle of my third year at Kinnick High School.  My teaching continues to change.  This change is what I want to discuss:

Student Teaching:
My student teaching was with Travis Lemon.  A amazing math teacher in American Fork, Utah.  Travis taught with a hands on, constructivist style.  This was the style that was taught and praised in my undergraduate studies, so I adapted and learned this style.  

The problem was I didn't fully believe it.  It is hard to change after I had been taught for 16 successful years in the traditional style.  Plus I saw lots of students who were struggling in this style and naively thought that the traditional method would be better.

As an undergraduate student, I observed traditional teachers classrooms and were critical of them.  For some reason, I thought that I could teach traditionally and be better.  I was blinded by pride.

Student Teaching:
After graduating from college and moving to Texas, I wasn't able to secure a teaching position.  So I decided to begin substitute teaching.  This was a great opportunity for me to practice my classroom management skills. I learned that knowing student's names was powerful and physically moving around the room was powerful.  These are things that were taught to me in my classroom management.

First Semester of Teaching:
After one semester of substitute teaching, I was hired to teach at Celeste High School, in Celeste Texas.  It was a school of 160 students, 40 in each grade.  I taught all of the Juniors and many of the seniors.  The students were very weak in mathematics.  I was teaching "Algebra 2" and the students were clearly at the Algebra 1 level.  They also wouldn't do homework, so I adjusted to meet their needs and had a great experience.

Since I was far away from BYU and I could truly teach how I wanted, I taught very traditionally.  This is what the students were used to, and they enjoyed it.

The principal told me to help the students pass the TAKS tests.  So we spent a lot of time preparing for that test.  While I was there, all of the juniors passed all content areas of the TAKS tests.  This had never happened before in the history of the school!

This positive experience solidified by belief that I can teach in the traditional style and be successful.

Kinnick High School
Following that one semester of teaching, I was offered my dream job; to teach for the Department of Defense in Japan.  These students were much different.  They were more where they were academically prepared for Algebra 1 and Geometry.

Again I taught traditionally, but this time my students really struggled.  In Celeste the students were low, but they were all low together.  They had been in the same classes with the same teachers and knew the same material.  There were only a few students who had transferred in later and they were my stringers students.  At Kinnick, I needed to differentiate much more, but I was unprepared to.  Differentiating instruction is something that you can learn in theory, but you can't understand without having actual students to work with.  It is also to Differentiate as a new teacher because you are creating every lessons, homework assignment, quiz and test for all of your students, there isn't time to make individual adaptations.  At least this is my perspective.

My second year at Kinnick, I went to a day of professional development and went to a session by Dan Galvin, a teacher at Yokota High School.  He mentioned that he was starting to use video in his lessons.  He explained the idea of the flipped classroom.  I latched onto the idea and decided that I would try it the next year.

This blog post is already long enough, I will talk more about flipped learning in my next post.

No comments:

Post a Comment